Influence of The Metamorphoses and Paradise Lost in...

Influence of The Metamorphoses and Paradise Lost in Frankenstein by Mary Shelley Frankenstein, possibly Mary Wollstonecraft Shelleys most well-known work, is considered by some to be the greatest Gothic Romance Novel. Due to her marriage to Percy Bysshe Shelley and close friendship with other prolific Romantic authors and poets, namely Lord Byron, Shelleys works permeate with Romantic themes and references. Also present in Frankenstein are obvious allusions to The Metamorphoses by Ovid and Paradise Lost by Milton. Shelley had been studying these two novels during her stay at Lord Byrons villa, and at the time she was composing Frankenstein. The use of these references and themes prove that Mary Shelley was a product of her†¦show more content†¦No one can concieve the variety of feelings which bore me onwards, like a hurricane, in the first enthusiaasm of success. Life and death appeared to me ideal bounds, which I should first break through, and pour a torrent of light into our dark world. A new species would bless me as its creator and source; many happy and excellent natures would owe their being to me. Walton expresses in his letters his bouts of solitude; he is extremely lonely because he has nno friend with whom he can share his Romantic visions nor with whom he can share his enthusiastic response to life. This loneliness will also be felt by Frankenstein when he leaves his homeShow MoreRelatedFrankensteins Origin: Assessing Thompsons Argument for the Creatures Literary Ancestors 1443 Words   |  6 PagesThe greatest modern stories often hai l from ancient myths, and Mary Shelleys novel, Frankenstein, proves no exception to this claim. Replete with references to John Miltons Paradise Lost and the ancient Greek myth of Prometheus, the story of Frankenstein seems, in many ways, very much like the Creature himself—which is to say, cobbled together from various scraps of previously existing parts. Terry W. Thompson, however, argues convincingly that scholars continue to ignore one of FrankensteinsRead More Mary Shelleys Frankenstein as a Portrait of Evil Essay1701 Words   |  7 PagesFrankenstein as a Portrait of Evil   Ã‚  Ã‚   Mary Shelleys Frankenstein is more than just a story of a creation gone bad; it is rather a story of evil that compares Victor Frankenstein to Prometheus and his monster as a God-like figure. Mary was able to do this by all of the influences that she had. These influences made her able to write a new, modern, Prometheus that did not directly call upon God, but, however, it did directly call on evil.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   The influences that Mary ShelleyRead MoreMary Shelley s The Rights Of Woman2944 Words   |  12 Pagesthey said or what they stated in their writing like Mary Wollstonecraft and her daughter Mary Shelley. Mary Wollstonecraft s Vindication was the first of many replies. It is an interesting and rhetorically powerful work in its own right as well as a necessary introduction to the Vindication of the Rights of Woman. Mary Shelley wrote prolifically, most noticeably the plays Midas and Proserpine, the novel Matilda, and Valperga, a historical novel. Mary tudor might have been conceived done SpitalfieldsRead MorePolitics and The English Language: George Orwell ´s Literature3705 Words   |  15 Pagesimplements a paradoxical set of literary devices throughout his thesis, which has arguably forged him as one of the greatest social commentators of modern history. The thesis which spans over the body of Orwell’s work extrapolates upon the integral influence that writing has on society and to reinstate the integrity of the writer. Orwell’s essays have sparked a plethora of adverse and auxiliary opinions regarding the imperishability of his work, from those whom believe that his efforts are archaic, to

Eisenhower Doctrine Definition and Analysis

The Eisenhower Doctrine was an official expression of U.S. foreign policy delivered to a joint session of Congress by President Dwight D. Eisenhower on January 5, 1957. Eisenhower’s proposal called for a more proactive economic and military role on the part of the United States in the increasingly tense situation threatening peace in the Middle East at the time. Under the Eisenhower Doctrine, any Middle Eastern country being threatened by armed aggression from any other country could request and receive economic assistance and/or military assistance from the United States. In a â€Å"Special Message to the Congress on the Situation in the Middle East,† Eisenhower tacitly pointed to the Soviet Union as the most likely aggressor in the Middle East by promising the commitment of U.S. forces â€Å"to secure and protect the territorial integrity and political independence of such nations, requesting such aid against overt armed aggression from any nation controlled by international communism.† Key Takeaways: Eisenhower Doctrine Adopted in 1957, the Eisenhower Doctrine was a key aspect of U.S. foreign policy under the administration of President Dwight D. Eisenhower.The Eisenhower Doctrine promised U.S. economic and military combat assistance to any Middle Eastern country facing armed aggression.The intent of the Eisenhower Doctrine was to prevent the Soviet Union from spreading communism throughout the Middle East.   Background The rapid deterioration of stability in the Middle East during 1956 greatly concerned the Eisenhower administration. In July 1956, as Egypt’s anti-Western leader Gamal Nasser established ever-closer ties to the Soviet Union, both the U.S. and the United Kingdom cut off their support for the construction of the Aswan High Dam on the Nile River. In response, Egypt, aided by the Soviet Union, seized and nationalized the Suez Canal intending to use ship passage fees to fund the dam. In October 1956, armed forces of Israel, Britain, and France invaded Egypt and pushed toward the Suez Canal. When the Soviet Union threatened to join the conflict in support of Nasser, its already delicate relationship with the United States crumbled. Israeli Tanks Occupy Gaza During Suez Canal Crisis of 1956. Hulton Archive / Getty Images Though Israel, Britain, and France had withdrawn their troops by early 1957, the Suez Crisis left the Middle East dangerously fragmented. Regarding the crisis as a major escalation of the Cold War on the part of the Soviet Union, Eisenhower feared the Middle East could fall victim to the spread of communism. In the summer of 1958, the Eisenhower Doctrine was tested when civil strife—rather than Soviet aggression—in Lebanon drove Lebanese president Camille Chamoun to request U.S. assistance. Under the terms of the Eisenhower Doctrine, nearly 15,000 U.S. troops were sent to put down the disturbances. With its actions in Lebanon, the U.S. confirmed its long-term commitment to protecting its interests in the Middle East. Eisenhower Foreign Policy President Eisenhower brought what he called a â€Å"New Look† to U.S. foreign policy, emphasizing the need to respond to the spread of communism. In that context, Eisenhower’s foreign policy was greatly influenced by his staunch anti-communist Secretary of State John Foster Dulles. To Dulles, all nations were either part of the â€Å"Free World† or part of the communist Soviet bloc; there was no middle-ground. Believing that political efforts alone would not stop Soviet expansion, Eisenhower and Dulles adopted a policy known as Massive Retaliation, a scenario in which the U.S would be prepared to use atomic weapons if it or any of its allies were attacked.  Ã‚   Along with the threat of communist expansion in the region, Eisenhower knew the Middle East held a large percentage of the world’s oil reserves, which were badly needed by the U.S. and its allies. During the 1956 Suez Crisis, Eisenhower had objected to the actions of U.S. allies—Britain and France, thus establishing the U.S. as the lone western military power in the Middle East. This position meant that America’s oil security was more at risk should the Soviet Union succeed in imposing its political will in the region.   Impact and Legacy of the Eisenhower Doctrine The Eisenhower Doctrine’s promise of U.S. military intervention in the Middle East was not universally embraced. Both Egypt and Syria, supported by the Soviet Union, strongly objected to it. Most of the Arab nations—fearing Israeli â€Å"Zionist imperialism† more than Soviet communism—were at best skeptical of the Eisenhower Doctrine. Egypt continued to accept money and arms from the U.S. until the Six-Day War in 1967. In practice, the Eisenhower Doctrine simply continued the existing U.S. commitment of military support for Greece and Turkey pledged by the Truman Doctrine of 1947. In the United States, some newspapers objected to the Eisenhower Doctrine, arguing that the cost and the extent of American involvement were left open-ended and vague. While the doctrine itself did not mention any specific funding, Eisenhower told Congress he would seek $200 million (about $1.8 billion in 2019 dollars) for economic and military aid in both 1958 and 1959. Eisenhower contended that his proposal was the only way to address the â€Å"power-hungry communists.† Congress voted overwhelmingly to adopt the Eisenhower Doctrine. In the long run, the Eisenhower Doctrine failed to succeed in containing communism. Indeed, the foreign policies of future presidents Kennedy, Johnson, Nixon, Carter, and Reagan all embodied similar doctrines. It was not until December 1991 that the Reagan Doctrine, combined with economic and political unrest within the Soviet bloc itself, brought the dissolution of the Soviet Union and the end of the Cold War. Sources The Eisenhower Doctrine, 1957. U.S. Department of State, Office of the Historian.Foreign Policy Under President Eisenhower. U.S. Department of State, Office of the Historian.Elghossain, Anthony. When the Marines Came to Lebanon. The New Republic (July 25, 2018).Hahn, Peter L. (2006). Securing the Middle East: The Eisenhower Doctrine of 1957. Presidential Studies Quarterly.Pach, Chester J., Jr. Dwight D. Eisenhower: Foreign Affairs. University of Virginia, Miller Center.

Achieving Strategic Fit Free Essays

Strategic fit express the degree to which an organization is matching its resources and capabilities with the opportunities in the external environment. The matching takes place through strategy and it is therefore vital that the company have the actual resources and capabilities to execute and support the strategy. Strategic fit can be used actively to evaluate the current strategic situation of a company as well as opportunities as MA and divestitures of organizational divisions. We will write a custom essay sample on Achieving Strategic Fit or any similar topic only for you Order Now Strategic fit is related to the Resource-based view of the firm which suggests that the key to profitability is not only through positioning and industry selection but rather through an internal focus which seeks to utilize the unique characteristics of the company’s portfolio of resources and capabilities. [1] A unique combination of resources and capabilities can eventually be developed into a competitive advantage which the company can profit from. However, it is important to differentiate between resources and capabilities. Resources relate to the inputs to production owned by the company, whereas capabilities describe the accumulation of learning the company possesses. Resources can be classified both as tangible and intangible: Tangible: Financial (Cash, securities) Physical (Location, plant, machinery) Intangible: Technology (Patents, copyrights) Human resources Reputation (Brands) Culture Several tools have been developed one can use in order to analyze the resources and capabilities of a company. These include SWOT, value chain analysis, cash flow analysis and more. Benchmarking with relevant peers is a useful tool to assess the relative strengths of the resources and capabilities of the company compared to its competitors. Strategic fit can also be used to evaluate specific opportunities like MA opportunities. Strategic fit would in this case refer to how well the potential acquisition fits with the planned direction (strategy) of the acquiring company. In order to justify growth through MA transactions the transaction should ield a better return than Organic growth. The Differential Efficiency Theory states that the acquiring firm will be able increase its efficiency in the areas where the acquired firm is superior. In addition the theory argues that MA transactions give the acquiring firm the possibility of achieving positive synergy effects meaning that the two merged companies are worth more together than the sums of their parts individually. [2] This is because merging companies may enjoy from economics of scale and economics of scope. However, in reality many MA transactions fails due to different factors, one of them being lack of strategic fit. A CEO survey conducted by Bain Company showed that 94% of the interviewed CEO’s considered the strategic fit to be vitally influential in the success or failure of an acquisition. [3] A high degree of strategic fit from can potentially yield many benefits for an organization. Best case scenario a high degree of strategic fit may be the key to a successful merger, an efficient organization, synergy effects or cost reductions. How to cite Achieving Strategic Fit, Essay examples

Bronwyn Donaghy about the facts and consequences of teenage sex Essay Example For Students

Bronwyn Donaghy about the facts and consequences of teenage sex Essay In the expository text Unzipped- everything teenagers want to know about love, sex and each other, Bronwyn Donaghy has written about the facts and consequences of teenage sex. By doing so she has presented us with her old fashioned ideologies and her strong anti-teenage-sex values and attitudes. As the audience Donaghy has tried to scare us into believing and following these attitudes, which are very evident throughout the entire text. Virginity and abstinence is the way to go. This text is targeted at young youths who are curious and want to explore their sexuality and their parents who Donaghy thinks should be open and willing to educate their children on the subject. In order to do this she has employed the use of three different writing styles: These being narrative, expository and real life accounts. Between chapters and further the different sexual topics, Donaghy has split the information up by an ongoing fictional story, which runs through the entire book. It is a narrative story about two inquisitive and curious adolescent teenagers who fall in love and start to get full on but then decide against the idea of sex as it is simply too complicated. Donaghy has done this by using very down to earth language that she thinks teenagers can relate to and a simplistic story line. However by trying to relate to teenagers at what she perceives is their level in my opinion gives the story very little realism in regards to reality as she simply cant pull it off. The story is made to almost look superficial. Within the story it is made very clear that abstinence is the way to go, reflect Donaghys ideologies. As the writer she does not even try to hide this attitude of hers and at one stage, through Bens mum is able to vocalise this: Love is a wonderful thingà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ ¦. Sex on the other hand, can be very dangerous in the hands of the young and inexperienced. She then goes on to say: I sincerely hope you wont. This is in relation to Ben and Lucys sex life. By creating this story Donaghy tries to manipulate us as the audience to accept these ideas and her values as being right. To further shape our response towards this very strong attitude Lucy and Ben adhered to Bens mums opinion and further Donaghys ideologies. She developed these characters in order to express her perception of what teenage relationships should be like in her eyes. To reinforce her no sex attitudes Donaghy moves from the ideal perfect couple, Ben and Lucy to a chapter of a real life account from the perfect virgins point of view. We meet Amira. Amira is 21 and still a virgin. She is described by Donaghy as having the face of and eastern princess, which immediately positions us to respect her and see her in a positive light. She comes from a supportive, hard-working family, goes to church every Sunday and does not believe in sex before marriage. She is made out to be picture perfect. As the audience we are made to see her as a role model. Within this story Amiras values and attitudes are made very obvious. She values love, companionship and a good family life. She believes that sex is special and is worth waiting for. It is worth waiting dor love. Within her story she even quotes: I want sex to be really special, with the right person. I would never consider having casual sex, just for the sake of it. Her values and attitudes reflect Donaghys ideologies perfectly and for this reason Donaghy has almost gone to the extent of putting a halo over Amiras head. In contrast to Amira there is Helen. She is very much not the little angel-like Amira. In her opening sentence to introduce Helen, Donaghy finds it difficult to reconcile the purity and beauty of Helens face with the horrors of all she has experienced. .u2fad7a29e427274d7251fefbaf94361a , .u2fad7a29e427274d7251fefbaf94361a .postImageUrl , .u2fad7a29e427274d7251fefbaf94361a .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u2fad7a29e427274d7251fefbaf94361a , .u2fad7a29e427274d7251fefbaf94361a:hover , .u2fad7a29e427274d7251fefbaf94361a:visited , .u2fad7a29e427274d7251fefbaf94361a:active { border:0!important; } .u2fad7a29e427274d7251fefbaf94361a .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u2fad7a29e427274d7251fefbaf94361a { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u2fad7a29e427274d7251fefbaf94361a:active , .u2fad7a29e427274d7251fefbaf94361a:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u2fad7a29e427274d7251fefbaf94361a .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u2fad7a29e427274d7251fefbaf94361a .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u2fad7a29e427274d7251fefbaf94361a .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u2fad7a29e427274d7251fefbaf94361a .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u2fad7a29e427274d7251fefbaf94361a:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u2fad7a29e427274d7251fefbaf94361a .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u2fad7a29e427274d7251fefbaf94361a .u2fad7a29e427274d7251fefbaf94361a-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u2fad7a29e427274d7251fefbaf94361a:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Cause And Effect: Top Gun EssayBy saying this Donaghy automatically enforces her negative view towards Helens way of life. As the audience we are positioned to view her differently to Amira. Helen cam from a disruptive childhood, where she was physically abused by her mothers boyfriend and her father was a drunk. By the time she was 12 she was in and out of foster homes and refuges for homeless girls. At 14 she had already lost her virginity in a one night stand and had moved in with a friend Kenny. There she met Raymond and a year later was pregnant with her first child. Helen is now married at 17 and pregnant with her second child. Donaghy has chosen to tell Helens story in order to express the consequences of sex and a rough upbringing. She has tried to scare adolescences from having sex, instead enjoy the wonders of love. Raymond quotes: It might have been fun to have had some time when we were just young and together. From this we are given the impression that even though he loves his son very much, he would of rather just be teenagers for a while and not have so much responsibility. After the consequences of sex, his son, he realises that love is better than sex and that life can be great without it; This conforming to Donaghys ideologies. Through contrasting these two very opposing situations we are persuaded to see how sex leads to serious consequences, however life without it is amazing and dignifying. Further to scare teenagers off sex, Donaghy has provided information about sex, via facts, figures, opinions and credible experts. Personally I did not think it was Donaghys place to be saying quite a bit of this section of the text, as she is not a doctor; her opinions are not evidentiary. I found the chapter Love of Sex? Great expectations, on some occasions fairly contradicting. She tries to relate to teenagers at their level and deal with the subject of sex with maturity, however writes Previous a chapter mainly for kids. She is not respecting teenagers as being mature. The opening paragraph tries to make the reader confused with sex and by doing so Donaghy has tried to stop teenagers from having sex. The chapter promotes abstinence and not having sex to you are older and or love, this being the whole ideology of the text. With the help of Professor Sol Gordon, Donaghy differentiates between love and sex and we are given the definite opinion that she does not believe in sex without true love. However she also states that teenagers fall in and out of love all the time. This contradicts what she has said, should we sleep with everyone we love? Despite this, the expository section of this text is simply developed to portray her old fashioned ideologies, lighten curiosity and to scare teenagers from sex. In this text Unzipped, Bronwyn Donaghy has tried to inform teenagers and their parents about teenage sex and the consequences that come with it. At first to an extent, I found this book quite factual and relevant, however the more I red into to it the more this seemed not true. It is all about Donaghys personal opinions towards the subject and how she finds teenage sex as a bad thing. The text is very selective and there is not one occasion in the book where people dont regret sex or come out with any good experiences from it. This makes us come to the conclusion, are all expository texts designed entirely to inform and provide information or do they have an underlining meaning?